While the GAE is evil for conquering Europe, I'm almost as disgusted with the Europeans generally with the exception of De Gaulle, and Germans more specifically, for rolling over so easily. Denazification is, in a broad sense, no different than Reconstruction, and yet I see no German equivalent to Wade Hampton III or Nathan Bedford Forrest. The Germans are not only under the stiletto, they lick it like Quentin Tarantino impersonators.
Regarding the British Empire being more classically Imperialistic than the US, I believe it's just a matter of where the National Empire pops up the in the Faustian cycle as to how soft they are. The American Empire is softer than the British Empire which is softer than the Spanish (which is not to say I prefer the Spanish, I like the British the best). If one of the old colonial powers were to become independent again and start colonizing, it would be spreading "Western values" same as the US is now. The creation of the left was a back and forth between the two continents, so it cant be the US alone that created it, in spite it being the enforcer of cultural leftism in Europe for the 20th century. Europe also has contributions. Rousseau, Gramsci, Marx, Lenin, John Stuart Mill, Cromwell, Descartes, nor The Forty-Eighters came from Kentucky or Idaho.
You killed 10 million Germans to subjugate them 1939-1947. And you bombed the heart of the European heritage to rubble and raped and looted and desecrated and raped and looted and desecrated and raped and looted and desecrated the Germans again and again and again and again, up until this very day. Whatever you have turned Germany into is a testimony of what you are, not of Germans being pushovers.
Excellent summary. Put words on numerous nagging thoughts and presents the entire revolting picture. As a European, this shows why we must support Russia in her quest for independence, and nature of the fight we are in. A fight for our very existenceas peoples. As a civilization.
The fact that so many Americans on the right gloat about destroying Europe, the continent of their origin, should prove that American civilisation is anti-tradition.
I was wondering if it would be possible for you or a fellow reader to let me know where I can find a link to somewhere where it says the British Empire spent £2 on the Empire for every £1 it got back.
Another bing for the ding list of canonical DR texts. Along with such gems as The Populist Delusion by Dr Parvini, K-revolution by Nick Land, leaving the cathedral by Ryan Faulk and the very hungry caterpillar by Admiral Spire it has burst open yet another capillary in my maladjusted, ailing, buboerrific pink thinking organ.
Over a year later and somehow some have forgotten the ultimatum at the end there.
Any friend, especially American, should desire the death of the GAE more than they desire American primacy or survival as a unitary entity. To do otherwise is to make the same mistake as Britain under Churchill. It's pure selfishness and belligerence for a lie of greatness that never was. We would be better off as subjects of a genuine European power. I say all this as an American.
(By all rights Britain itself should not come out on top of continental Europe, however. Europe is not in good hands if it is in the hands of the British, but even worse for it to be in the hands of the GAE.)
This is useful, and yet incomplete without reference to the problems of Lockeian autonomous individualism, the socio-theological heresy of Americanism, and the minorities policy of the US elite from colonial days through suburbanization.
John Rao (http://jcrao.freeshell.org), Charles Coulombe, E. Michael Jones (Slaughter of Cities), David Wemhoff, and Iota Unum together cover the issues well.
"Burnham on Dante" is not a relevant response as what is being addressed is well-documented, concrete historical action by individuals, and what is being explained is both why anticivizational policies were pursued and what ideas and values must be in place to transform or eliminate the GAE (perhaps better termed AAE, the Anglo-American Empire, which is less likely to alienate American normie conservatives).
Why are liberal elites liberal? I mean can big coroperations not just function like they are shown in the media? Only care about profit an growth but don't care about social problems such as the "opression" of women and etc..
Do you think the elites of the GAE are more the major driver of decadence, or do you think they are more opportunists cashing in as things fall apart, ‘managed decline’? The flaw had to open before it could be exploited, and yet they are such an active engine of global decadence. Most likely a previous fall opens the floodgates for the next? Maybe it’s pointless to identify the mechanics of the Kali Yuga?
Good article. You can see also what the GAE does to those within the Empire who expose it and represent a significant threat to it's legitimacy. For example Julian Assange. Many on the right get as far as opposing all of the cultural aspects but have various justifications for it's exercise of power over other nations. Democracy, women's rights, defending Europe, the Chinese are worse etc.
Instead of describing what GAE is, you should be offering alternatives.
For example, which system would allow East European nation-states, that are sometimes 99% ethnically homogenous, safe and cozy, like Poland, to maintain that status quo?
And don't sell the GAE will put PoCs in, cause we have raised fences and put the army on the border, and it was not GAE that tried to infect the country, but Belarus, as an extension of Russia.
Belarus did so, explicitly as a weapon. This forced the corrupt eurocrats to reveal themselves. And was therefore a Good Thing as it lead to a small victory for our side at small cost.
Didn’t your own government recently pass an immigration law to let in up to 1% of the population annually (400k immigrants) from places like Pakistan and Nigeria? Also, your recently elected American-aligned government is working on hate speech laws to criminalize criticism of LGBT.
While the GAE is evil for conquering Europe, I'm almost as disgusted with the Europeans generally with the exception of De Gaulle, and Germans more specifically, for rolling over so easily. Denazification is, in a broad sense, no different than Reconstruction, and yet I see no German equivalent to Wade Hampton III or Nathan Bedford Forrest. The Germans are not only under the stiletto, they lick it like Quentin Tarantino impersonators.
Regarding the British Empire being more classically Imperialistic than the US, I believe it's just a matter of where the National Empire pops up the in the Faustian cycle as to how soft they are. The American Empire is softer than the British Empire which is softer than the Spanish (which is not to say I prefer the Spanish, I like the British the best). If one of the old colonial powers were to become independent again and start colonizing, it would be spreading "Western values" same as the US is now. The creation of the left was a back and forth between the two continents, so it cant be the US alone that created it, in spite it being the enforcer of cultural leftism in Europe for the 20th century. Europe also has contributions. Rousseau, Gramsci, Marx, Lenin, John Stuart Mill, Cromwell, Descartes, nor The Forty-Eighters came from Kentucky or Idaho.
You killed 10 million Germans to subjugate them 1939-1947. And you bombed the heart of the European heritage to rubble and raped and looted and desecrated and raped and looted and desecrated and raped and looted and desecrated the Germans again and again and again and again, up until this very day. Whatever you have turned Germany into is a testimony of what you are, not of Germans being pushovers.
Were you hanged for having pictures of Robert E Lee in your house during reconstruction?
Excellent summary. Put words on numerous nagging thoughts and presents the entire revolting picture. As a European, this shows why we must support Russia in her quest for independence, and nature of the fight we are in. A fight for our very existenceas peoples. As a civilization.
Cigar Stream on all of the IMF interventions?
The fact that so many Americans on the right gloat about destroying Europe, the continent of their origin, should prove that American civilisation is anti-tradition.
USA is not a nation. That was one of the main points of the American experiment.
Just because some Americans look like Europeans is deceptive, the difference in outlook is vast.
I was wondering if it would be possible for you or a fellow reader to let me know where I can find a link to somewhere where it says the British Empire spent £2 on the Empire for every £1 it got back.
Watch this video from the time stamp: https://youtu.be/mEX13GrLwqg?t=104
Thank you
Great piece, fantastic work.
Another bing for the ding list of canonical DR texts. Along with such gems as The Populist Delusion by Dr Parvini, K-revolution by Nick Land, leaving the cathedral by Ryan Faulk and the very hungry caterpillar by Admiral Spire it has burst open yet another capillary in my maladjusted, ailing, buboerrific pink thinking organ.
Excellent article. I have shared it with friends
Over a year later and somehow some have forgotten the ultimatum at the end there.
Any friend, especially American, should desire the death of the GAE more than they desire American primacy or survival as a unitary entity. To do otherwise is to make the same mistake as Britain under Churchill. It's pure selfishness and belligerence for a lie of greatness that never was. We would be better off as subjects of a genuine European power. I say all this as an American.
(By all rights Britain itself should not come out on top of continental Europe, however. Europe is not in good hands if it is in the hands of the British, but even worse for it to be in the hands of the GAE.)
This is useful, and yet incomplete without reference to the problems of Lockeian autonomous individualism, the socio-theological heresy of Americanism, and the minorities policy of the US elite from colonial days through suburbanization.
John Rao (http://jcrao.freeshell.org), Charles Coulombe, E. Michael Jones (Slaughter of Cities), David Wemhoff, and Iota Unum together cover the issues well.
"Burnham on Dante" is not a relevant response as what is being addressed is well-documented, concrete historical action by individuals, and what is being explained is both why anticivizational policies were pursued and what ideas and values must be in place to transform or eliminate the GAE (perhaps better termed AAE, the Anglo-American Empire, which is less likely to alienate American normie conservatives).
Average GAE fan < Average British Empire Enjoyer
Why are liberal elites liberal? I mean can big coroperations not just function like they are shown in the media? Only care about profit an growth but don't care about social problems such as the "opression" of women and etc..
Do you think the elites of the GAE are more the major driver of decadence, or do you think they are more opportunists cashing in as things fall apart, ‘managed decline’? The flaw had to open before it could be exploited, and yet they are such an active engine of global decadence. Most likely a previous fall opens the floodgates for the next? Maybe it’s pointless to identify the mechanics of the Kali Yuga?
Good article. You can see also what the GAE does to those within the Empire who expose it and represent a significant threat to it's legitimacy. For example Julian Assange. Many on the right get as far as opposing all of the cultural aspects but have various justifications for it's exercise of power over other nations. Democracy, women's rights, defending Europe, the Chinese are worse etc.
Instead of describing what GAE is, you should be offering alternatives.
For example, which system would allow East European nation-states, that are sometimes 99% ethnically homogenous, safe and cozy, like Poland, to maintain that status quo?
And don't sell the GAE will put PoCs in, cause we have raised fences and put the army on the border, and it was not GAE that tried to infect the country, but Belarus, as an extension of Russia.
Not when there are hundreds of spergs who don’t know what it is
Poland is a more recent acquisition I suppose
Belarus did so, explicitly as a weapon. This forced the corrupt eurocrats to reveal themselves. And was therefore a Good Thing as it lead to a small victory for our side at small cost.
Didn’t your own government recently pass an immigration law to let in up to 1% of the population annually (400k immigrants) from places like Pakistan and Nigeria? Also, your recently elected American-aligned government is working on hate speech laws to criminalize criticism of LGBT.
Where have you got the numbers for Italy and Spain maintaining armies of over 150k?
Italy is around 98k and Spain around 75k.
Recent figures