While the GAE is evil for conquering Europe, I'm almost as disgusted with the Europeans generally with the exception of De Gaulle, and Germans more specifically, for rolling over so easily. Denazification is, in a broad sense, no different than Reconstruction, and yet I see no German equivalent to Wade Hampton III or Nathan Bedford Forrest. The Germans are not only under the stiletto, they lick it like Quentin Tarantino impersonators.
Regarding the British Empire being more classically Imperialistic than the US, I believe it's just a matter of where the National Empire pops up the in the Faustian cycle as to how soft they are. The American Empire is softer than the British Empire which is softer than the Spanish (which is not to say I prefer the Spanish, I like the British the best). If one of the old colonial powers were to become independent again and start colonizing, it would be spreading "Western values" same as the US is now. The creation of the left was a back and forth between the two continents, so it cant be the US alone that created it, in spite it being the enforcer of cultural leftism in Europe for the 20th century. Europe also has contributions. Rousseau, Gramsci, Marx, Lenin, John Stuart Mill, Cromwell, Descartes, nor The Forty-Eighters came from Kentucky or Idaho.
Excellent summary. Put words on numerous nagging thoughts and presents the entire revolting picture. As a European, this shows why we must support Russia in her quest for independence, and nature of the fight we are in. A fight for our very existenceas peoples. As a civilization.
I was wondering if it would be possible for you or a fellow reader to let me know where I can find a link to somewhere where it says the British Empire spent £2 on the Empire for every £1 it got back.
The fact that so many Americans on the right gloat about destroying Europe, the continent of their origin, should prove that American civilisation is anti-tradition.
I also think the vast majority of Americans are almost incapable of seeing the reality of their regime, an example of this is in Mark Collett’s recent book review on The Enemy of Europe where he had Greg Johnson on as a guest. The two had opposing views on America vs Russia where Collett saw America as the dissolver of culture, identity, and tradition and the ultimate evil, Johnson defended it against Russian civilisation. It was a very interesting listen.
Another bing for the ding list of canonical DR texts. Along with such gems as The Populist Delusion by Dr Parvini, K-revolution by Nick Land, leaving the cathedral by Ryan Faulk and the very hungry caterpillar by Admiral Spire it has burst open yet another capillary in my maladjusted, ailing, buboerrific pink thinking organ.
This is useful, and yet incomplete without reference to the problems of Lockeian autonomous individualism, the socio-theological heresy of Americanism, and the minorities policy of the US elite from colonial days through suburbanization.
John Rao (http://jcrao.freeshell.org), Charles Coulombe, E. Michael Jones (Slaughter of Cities), David Wemhoff, and Iota Unum together cover the issues well.
"Burnham on Dante" is not a relevant response as what is being addressed is well-documented, concrete historical action by individuals, and what is being explained is both why anticivizational policies were pursued and what ideas and values must be in place to transform or eliminate the GAE (perhaps better termed AAE, the Anglo-American Empire, which is less likely to alienate American normie conservatives).
Why are liberal elites liberal? I mean can big coroperations not just function like they are shown in the media? Only care about profit an growth but don't care about social problems such as the "opression" of women and etc..
Do you think the elites of the GAE are more the major driver of decadence, or do you think they are more opportunists cashing in as things fall apart, ‘managed decline’? The flaw had to open before it could be exploited, and yet they are such an active engine of global decadence. Most likely a previous fall opens the floodgates for the next? Maybe it’s pointless to identify the mechanics of the Kali Yuga?
Good article. You can see also what the GAE does to those within the Empire who expose it and represent a significant threat to it's legitimacy. For example Julian Assange. Many on the right get as far as opposing all of the cultural aspects but have various justifications for it's exercise of power over other nations. Democracy, women's rights, defending Europe, the Chinese are worse etc.
Instead of describing what GAE is, you should be offering alternatives.
For example, which system would allow East European nation-states, that are sometimes 99% ethnically homogenous, safe and cozy, like Poland, to maintain that status quo?
And don't sell the GAE will put PoCs in, cause we have raised fences and put the army on the border, and it was not GAE that tried to infect the country, but Belarus, as an extension of Russia.
Thanks for writing this. I disagree on a couple of the basic introductory points...
I think it is sufficient to say that USA operates a monopoly on global trade. All countries are forced to play by America's rules or not play at all. If they choose not to play, they will quickly be outcompeted by their rivals should they choose to opt-in to the american system: see, N. Korea vs. S. Korea.
It is not correct to say that the relationship is colonial. That would imply a level of reciprocity (i.e. money to USA) and control (i.e. orders from USA) than actually exists. The system in practice is much more like a protection racket than an empire in any sense of the word.
GAE offers: freedom from pirates and other trade disruption, equal economic footing with your geographic rivals. GAE receives: please don't join USSR. Obviously, since the fall of the USSR this deal has not made any sense, geopolitically.
Hence, a return to isolationist rhetoric across the board.
Using this frame it is much simpler to understand the sequence of events from 9/11 to Iraq war. 9/11 is symbolic declaration of war against GAE trade empire. Then Iraq war is attempt re-establish stability in an important TRADE region (oil producing states).
GAE is basically a corporation that provides free access vertically integrated global trade in exchange for the absence of rivals.
While the GAE is evil for conquering Europe, I'm almost as disgusted with the Europeans generally with the exception of De Gaulle, and Germans more specifically, for rolling over so easily. Denazification is, in a broad sense, no different than Reconstruction, and yet I see no German equivalent to Wade Hampton III or Nathan Bedford Forrest. The Germans are not only under the stiletto, they lick it like Quentin Tarantino impersonators.
Regarding the British Empire being more classically Imperialistic than the US, I believe it's just a matter of where the National Empire pops up the in the Faustian cycle as to how soft they are. The American Empire is softer than the British Empire which is softer than the Spanish (which is not to say I prefer the Spanish, I like the British the best). If one of the old colonial powers were to become independent again and start colonizing, it would be spreading "Western values" same as the US is now. The creation of the left was a back and forth between the two continents, so it cant be the US alone that created it, in spite it being the enforcer of cultural leftism in Europe for the 20th century. Europe also has contributions. Rousseau, Gramsci, Marx, Lenin, John Stuart Mill, Cromwell, Descartes, nor The Forty-Eighters came from Kentucky or Idaho.
Cigar Stream on all of the IMF interventions?
Excellent summary. Put words on numerous nagging thoughts and presents the entire revolting picture. As a European, this shows why we must support Russia in her quest for independence, and nature of the fight we are in. A fight for our very existenceas peoples. As a civilization.
I was wondering if it would be possible for you or a fellow reader to let me know where I can find a link to somewhere where it says the British Empire spent £2 on the Empire for every £1 it got back.
The fact that so many Americans on the right gloat about destroying Europe, the continent of their origin, should prove that American civilisation is anti-tradition.
I also think the vast majority of Americans are almost incapable of seeing the reality of their regime, an example of this is in Mark Collett’s recent book review on The Enemy of Europe where he had Greg Johnson on as a guest. The two had opposing views on America vs Russia where Collett saw America as the dissolver of culture, identity, and tradition and the ultimate evil, Johnson defended it against Russian civilisation. It was a very interesting listen.
Another bing for the ding list of canonical DR texts. Along with such gems as The Populist Delusion by Dr Parvini, K-revolution by Nick Land, leaving the cathedral by Ryan Faulk and the very hungry caterpillar by Admiral Spire it has burst open yet another capillary in my maladjusted, ailing, buboerrific pink thinking organ.
Great piece, fantastic work.
This is useful, and yet incomplete without reference to the problems of Lockeian autonomous individualism, the socio-theological heresy of Americanism, and the minorities policy of the US elite from colonial days through suburbanization.
John Rao (http://jcrao.freeshell.org), Charles Coulombe, E. Michael Jones (Slaughter of Cities), David Wemhoff, and Iota Unum together cover the issues well.
"Burnham on Dante" is not a relevant response as what is being addressed is well-documented, concrete historical action by individuals, and what is being explained is both why anticivizational policies were pursued and what ideas and values must be in place to transform or eliminate the GAE (perhaps better termed AAE, the Anglo-American Empire, which is less likely to alienate American normie conservatives).
Why are liberal elites liberal? I mean can big coroperations not just function like they are shown in the media? Only care about profit an growth but don't care about social problems such as the "opression" of women and etc..
Do you think the elites of the GAE are more the major driver of decadence, or do you think they are more opportunists cashing in as things fall apart, ‘managed decline’? The flaw had to open before it could be exploited, and yet they are such an active engine of global decadence. Most likely a previous fall opens the floodgates for the next? Maybe it’s pointless to identify the mechanics of the Kali Yuga?
Good article. You can see also what the GAE does to those within the Empire who expose it and represent a significant threat to it's legitimacy. For example Julian Assange. Many on the right get as far as opposing all of the cultural aspects but have various justifications for it's exercise of power over other nations. Democracy, women's rights, defending Europe, the Chinese are worse etc.
Excellent article. I have shared it with friends
Instead of describing what GAE is, you should be offering alternatives.
For example, which system would allow East European nation-states, that are sometimes 99% ethnically homogenous, safe and cozy, like Poland, to maintain that status quo?
And don't sell the GAE will put PoCs in, cause we have raised fences and put the army on the border, and it was not GAE that tried to infect the country, but Belarus, as an extension of Russia.
Where have you got the numbers for Italy and Spain maintaining armies of over 150k?
Italy is around 98k and Spain around 75k.
> Bronze Age Pervert has suggested an alternative recently, the GNC or (‘Global N****r Communism’)
That got a belly laugh out of me. If we had free speech on the internet, that would be my go-to term.
Thanks for writing this. I disagree on a couple of the basic introductory points...
I think it is sufficient to say that USA operates a monopoly on global trade. All countries are forced to play by America's rules or not play at all. If they choose not to play, they will quickly be outcompeted by their rivals should they choose to opt-in to the american system: see, N. Korea vs. S. Korea.
It is not correct to say that the relationship is colonial. That would imply a level of reciprocity (i.e. money to USA) and control (i.e. orders from USA) than actually exists. The system in practice is much more like a protection racket than an empire in any sense of the word.
GAE offers: freedom from pirates and other trade disruption, equal economic footing with your geographic rivals. GAE receives: please don't join USSR. Obviously, since the fall of the USSR this deal has not made any sense, geopolitically.
Hence, a return to isolationist rhetoric across the board.
Using this frame it is much simpler to understand the sequence of events from 9/11 to Iraq war. 9/11 is symbolic declaration of war against GAE trade empire. Then Iraq war is attempt re-establish stability in an important TRADE region (oil producing states).
GAE is basically a corporation that provides free access vertically integrated global trade in exchange for the absence of rivals.