AA you acknowledge this idea when there are radical elements introduced into the government using AOC as the example, they are utterly disciplined into falling in line, or two-a-penny Democrat. In contrast you worry about the lack of gatekeeping on the MAGA side of things. You have genuine concerns for this obsession with having a colorf…
AA you acknowledge this idea when there are radical elements introduced into the government using AOC as the example, they are utterly disciplined into falling in line, or two-a-penny Democrat. In contrast you worry about the lack of gatekeeping on the MAGA side of things. You have genuine concerns for this obsession with having a colorful representation as more white people will be less represented and other glaring problems. If I am recalling from article correctly, Trump brings his own element into the party, but you worry about his almost-always liberal preferences on who he selects. I want to see if you at least agree with regards to the people like moving from California to Texas who bring their terrible ideas with them. With the prospect that yes they may be bringing some elements into the MAGA movement if they decide to side with us, is it not also true that the influence of MAGA will discipline these liberals on some level and thus bring more "stability" to the structure as a whole? I am not denying the possible nature of some uniparty, or people who simply have power that want to keep it, but perhaps ideology itself is playing a more larger role than it sounds?
I am not a diligent fact checker, so I cannot throw any statistics at you on what I think or see because I don't know what to think or where to look. I cannot even tell what is in any of their hearts. But it appears that there are some positive prospects of potentially disciplining those that were rejected by the Democrat party for the better. Is that assumption too out of touch with reality or is could there really something changing in people? And should that matter? Power structures aside.
AA you acknowledge this idea when there are radical elements introduced into the government using AOC as the example, they are utterly disciplined into falling in line, or two-a-penny Democrat. In contrast you worry about the lack of gatekeeping on the MAGA side of things. You have genuine concerns for this obsession with having a colorful representation as more white people will be less represented and other glaring problems. If I am recalling from article correctly, Trump brings his own element into the party, but you worry about his almost-always liberal preferences on who he selects. I want to see if you at least agree with regards to the people like moving from California to Texas who bring their terrible ideas with them. With the prospect that yes they may be bringing some elements into the MAGA movement if they decide to side with us, is it not also true that the influence of MAGA will discipline these liberals on some level and thus bring more "stability" to the structure as a whole? I am not denying the possible nature of some uniparty, or people who simply have power that want to keep it, but perhaps ideology itself is playing a more larger role than it sounds?
I am not a diligent fact checker, so I cannot throw any statistics at you on what I think or see because I don't know what to think or where to look. I cannot even tell what is in any of their hearts. But it appears that there are some positive prospects of potentially disciplining those that were rejected by the Democrat party for the better. Is that assumption too out of touch with reality or is could there really something changing in people? And should that matter? Power structures aside.