I'll give you credit for your intellectual honesty. I wrote you off, like that hackfraud Auron Macintyre and all the other dissident channels and influencers that rush to defend every incompetent flatulence Trump and his troupe of troglodytes emit. If someone is not disgusted by this clown parade and their oligarchic puppeteers, they are not a serious person to me. Maybe I was mistaken. You seem to have integrity and courage to infuriate the majority of your own audience and fellow travellers.
To me "woke" and "maga" are simulacra. It's smoke and shadows to keep people disctracted from real issues.
I'd say social democracy or what you call the labour movement was damaged far more by cohabiting with american neo-liberalism, of which "woke" was just one shoggoth.
Your instincts are right about Auron. He works for The Blaze for f sakes. Can’t escape that fact. Furthermore, his cloak of Christianity is quite problematic because of its universalist applications. His religion is a choice. His DNA isn’t. Sadly, he would more than likely reject his DNA (bloodline) before dropping his religious preference, if push came to shove.
Auron was a school teacher, you are straight-jacketed into talking like a liberal when you take that path. Its a scar that he bears. We might have to get used to having people who speak like that on our side. Its not the people and their way of speaking thats necessarily the problem, its their heads full of garbage. But yes, your instincts are bang on. But they are CHUD instincts, as well. Its a give and take situation!
Is it really necessary to squabble like this? I think you should venture to have the librarian on as a guest on your podcast. I've listened to him as a guest on other podcasts and he's articulate and we'll read.
I think his main gripe in this completely unnecessary squabble is your unnecessary use of superfluous descriptive pejoratives in relation to content creators like MW. Like it or not, tabloids have their place in the MSM architecture and beating down on those who simp on page 3 doesn't build bridges. In the greater scheme of things it's better to point out how the machine is trying to shift the narratives on Epstein so a good crisis doesn't go to waste, than to lump those caught in the whitewater vortex into a category of déplorables to be left behind. Either the tide lifts all boats or whatever boats survive won't be much use in the face of inevitable tsunami.
From my perspective it's a classic case of high/low culture and group membership. Personally I think it's all very boring.
Also, if you have it in you to step back and consider that not everyone can write a cogent essay, perhaps you can also consider taking a step back and trying a different direction? Is it not better to agree to disagree, yet find common ground? The librarian doesn't produce slop content.
You might find he provides a great perspective on what goes on at the other end of the Atlantic.
True but there's a lot worse than MW. By the same token 99% of content is a distraction. The battle is over attention. Keeping in mind his popularity is partly due to his backers, his image is constructed/curated to fit with capturing certain vertical segments.
Personally I always saw him as a one trick pony with the woman question who branched out as a talking head. Same but different to CK.
At a basic level there's an attempt, either overtly (cultivate them while they're young) or covertly (corrupt them), to guide talking heads to tow the narrative. Those who play ball are pumped and those who don't are shadow banned.
Very few talking heads are truly independent.
It's the same across all media. Different mediums, different strategy and tactics.
AA picks on MW as slop because, in my opinion, he's prime time spectacle. Librarian has a valid point though, if you can't differentiate the forest for the trees, then all content creators who aren't aligned to an extremely high standard in "your/my" opinion get reduced to slop, which is just a way to promote cancel culture.
AA didn't pick MW on the basis of erroneous content or write a piece on why MW specifically is a waterboy for a certain narrative control agency controlled by some shadowy ideological organization attempting global supremacy™. His piece is more of a high level faux intellectual critique of the pathetic condition of blue pilled wannabe edgy red pillers who think online posting will somehow effect social and political change.
In this sense, MAGA died the day it was named, as do all populist movements when they get bridles. The movement preceded its naming.
On YT, AA said that until recently he was a DJT believer, or at least believed DJT could deliver. Librarian is still a believer, so he defends MAGA and DJT up to a point.
By contrast I was never a believer. But then I'm not American so I don't take it personally. I gave DJT a chance to prove me wrong in 2016 and he failed. In general I don't believe unvirtuous individuals can redeem a broken system. DJT is better than than the waltzing Camel Bidet or Hilarious, but they're all corrupt useful idiots. The USA is like the mothership and those behind the curtain aren't going to relinquish their control, so realistically DJT is like a miracle elephant in an antique store.
I think both the Librarian and AA, and I don't always agree with them, are learned individuals, from whom I've learnt a lot. Seeing them bicker a flame war is retarded in my opinion, but I'm limited to two neurons so what do I know. As the saying goes, divided we fall.
On the plus side if AA and Parvini had a fireside chat on a podcast I think they'd find they have more in common than they might think.
What actually ought to damage the credibility of the author of this article is the number of grammatical mistakes, particularly considering that the same author produced and still sells a course by the name of Foundations of Writing.
Nevertheless, the thoughts outlined therein are sage and salient; expecting the masses to take them onboard, however, is utter folly. It is both tragic and terrifying to notice how debased the mind of the modern mass man has become. At this point, why bother to try to guide these masses towards salvation? Let them all burn in the hell on earth which is now upon us.
Those who cheer on Trump & his zionist puppet masters are condoning & supporting their war crimes. Goyim celebrating their own slavery . They are mere husks of humanity.
I guess I'd need to hear more specifics. Of course Trump has been a train wreck when it comes to Epstein. What's the response then? I guess you're saying tune out. But to a lot of people that sounds like giving up. An alternative can't arise, I guess is the point?
The Epstein mania is especially saddening because no one is engaging with them holistically: just picking out whatever (in or out of proper context) fits their (and their targetted audience's) bias(es).
If these are legitimate (and accurately traced to sources by the the reader*), these communications between Epstein and whoever else reveal an window into an elite ethnography that has prior been extremely restricted AND a modern investment, networking and intelligence primer by someone who was if nothing else able at executing his intent.
People need to stop reacting and start thinking: even if you take the most maximalist conspiracy view, you now have a map for how they work. Those people should be MORE critically engaged, not less.
I'm sure some are. I'm mostly tracing domestic drama and logistics investment chains: If bro is alive the pandemic got him ten more islands.
*I’ve seen people take routine anonymous tip summaries as hard investigative findings
Agree with you on the MAGA right - kudos for taking a principled stance. However, please ditch the ‘Centre-Left’ rebranding. Definitionally and tactically, it just doesn’t make sense unless you’ve changed your views considerably. If you want to distance yourself from the MAGA right, just call them ‘fake Right’ and go back to calling yourself a ‘Sensible Centrist.’ Your other option would be to disown Evola, Carlyle, etc. or make some kind of Scooby-Doo argument that they were aKSuallY leftists all along (!) or if they were alive today they’d be leftists or something.
Watch my discussions with Caleb Maupin next week to see why I find this necessary at this time. I'm still making videos on Evola and Carlyle regularly.
It was high time to demand that people, if they are to be taken seriously, do not equivocate around calling a spade a spade. Looking back, I think that acknowledging that the woke was actually being put away as per the cigar bet and also seeing through the "assassination attempt" (which recognition does not require much effort even with a -5 in the school of schizo) were also appropriate litmus tests. But I suppose better late than never.
Following you for years, on-and-off as I have been variously busy with school and work and such, helped me to understand elite theory, and to feel utterly powerless against it. This drove me to Christ as the only possible solution to our problems.
The slop-MAGA right has been obvious to me since the Q-Anon retardation (probably the most effective campaign of containment, ever).
I do still sympathize with those unwilling to follow your path here. In an endless sea of utter despair, the human heart will crave a W and take whatever it can get, to the point of self delusion. I do not excuse this, but I do understand it. With Maduro in particular I felt this way. The Maduro affair reminded the world that hard power exists, and national borders are entirely fiction. This is not a problem, but an opportunity.
I'll give you credit for your intellectual honesty. I wrote you off, like that hackfraud Auron Macintyre and all the other dissident channels and influencers that rush to defend every incompetent flatulence Trump and his troupe of troglodytes emit. If someone is not disgusted by this clown parade and their oligarchic puppeteers, they are not a serious person to me. Maybe I was mistaken. You seem to have integrity and courage to infuriate the majority of your own audience and fellow travellers.
To me "woke" and "maga" are simulacra. It's smoke and shadows to keep people disctracted from real issues.
I'd say social democracy or what you call the labour movement was damaged far more by cohabiting with american neo-liberalism, of which "woke" was just one shoggoth.
Auron is a thoughtfull and important voice and his latest article is great.
And your name is supposed to be Gaucho, isn't it? Like cowboy, not gaunch/ginch as in underwear?
https://auronmacintyre.substack.com/p/the-wests-forbidden-truth-ethnic/comments
Your instincts are right about Auron. He works for The Blaze for f sakes. Can’t escape that fact. Furthermore, his cloak of Christianity is quite problematic because of its universalist applications. His religion is a choice. His DNA isn’t. Sadly, he would more than likely reject his DNA (bloodline) before dropping his religious preference, if push came to shove.
Auron was a school teacher, you are straight-jacketed into talking like a liberal when you take that path. Its a scar that he bears. We might have to get used to having people who speak like that on our side. Its not the people and their way of speaking thats necessarily the problem, its their heads full of garbage. But yes, your instincts are bang on. But they are CHUD instincts, as well. Its a give and take situation!
MAGA has been like a dud firework that didn't take off but the crowd are still hysterically cheering it on.
Is it really necessary to squabble like this? I think you should venture to have the librarian on as a guest on your podcast. I've listened to him as a guest on other podcasts and he's articulate and we'll read.
I think his main gripe in this completely unnecessary squabble is your unnecessary use of superfluous descriptive pejoratives in relation to content creators like MW. Like it or not, tabloids have their place in the MSM architecture and beating down on those who simp on page 3 doesn't build bridges. In the greater scheme of things it's better to point out how the machine is trying to shift the narratives on Epstein so a good crisis doesn't go to waste, than to lump those caught in the whitewater vortex into a category of déplorables to be left behind. Either the tide lifts all boats or whatever boats survive won't be much use in the face of inevitable tsunami.
From my perspective it's a classic case of high/low culture and group membership. Personally I think it's all very boring.
Also, if you have it in you to step back and consider that not everyone can write a cogent essay, perhaps you can also consider taking a step back and trying a different direction? Is it not better to agree to disagree, yet find common ground? The librarian doesn't produce slop content.
You might find he provides a great perspective on what goes on at the other end of the Atlantic.
Walsh acts as an energy sink and a distraction.
True but there's a lot worse than MW. By the same token 99% of content is a distraction. The battle is over attention. Keeping in mind his popularity is partly due to his backers, his image is constructed/curated to fit with capturing certain vertical segments.
There are worse energy sinks and distractions?
There are those who judge importance and direct energy well, MW is not that. He's more of a freak show barker.
Personally I always saw him as a one trick pony with the woman question who branched out as a talking head. Same but different to CK.
At a basic level there's an attempt, either overtly (cultivate them while they're young) or covertly (corrupt them), to guide talking heads to tow the narrative. Those who play ball are pumped and those who don't are shadow banned.
Very few talking heads are truly independent.
It's the same across all media. Different mediums, different strategy and tactics.
AA picks on MW as slop because, in my opinion, he's prime time spectacle. Librarian has a valid point though, if you can't differentiate the forest for the trees, then all content creators who aren't aligned to an extremely high standard in "your/my" opinion get reduced to slop, which is just a way to promote cancel culture.
AA didn't pick MW on the basis of erroneous content or write a piece on why MW specifically is a waterboy for a certain narrative control agency controlled by some shadowy ideological organization attempting global supremacy™. His piece is more of a high level faux intellectual critique of the pathetic condition of blue pilled wannabe edgy red pillers who think online posting will somehow effect social and political change.
In this sense, MAGA died the day it was named, as do all populist movements when they get bridles. The movement preceded its naming.
On YT, AA said that until recently he was a DJT believer, or at least believed DJT could deliver. Librarian is still a believer, so he defends MAGA and DJT up to a point.
By contrast I was never a believer. But then I'm not American so I don't take it personally. I gave DJT a chance to prove me wrong in 2016 and he failed. In general I don't believe unvirtuous individuals can redeem a broken system. DJT is better than than the waltzing Camel Bidet or Hilarious, but they're all corrupt useful idiots. The USA is like the mothership and those behind the curtain aren't going to relinquish their control, so realistically DJT is like a miracle elephant in an antique store.
I think both the Librarian and AA, and I don't always agree with them, are learned individuals, from whom I've learnt a lot. Seeing them bicker a flame war is retarded in my opinion, but I'm limited to two neurons so what do I know. As the saying goes, divided we fall.
On the plus side if AA and Parvini had a fireside chat on a podcast I think they'd find they have more in common than they might think.
What actually ought to damage the credibility of the author of this article is the number of grammatical mistakes, particularly considering that the same author produced and still sells a course by the name of Foundations of Writing.
Nevertheless, the thoughts outlined therein are sage and salient; expecting the masses to take them onboard, however, is utter folly. It is both tragic and terrifying to notice how debased the mind of the modern mass man has become. At this point, why bother to try to guide these masses towards salvation? Let them all burn in the hell on earth which is now upon us.
Outline the grammatical mistakes.
Those who cheer on Trump & his zionist puppet masters are condoning & supporting their war crimes. Goyim celebrating their own slavery . They are mere husks of humanity.
I guess I'd need to hear more specifics. Of course Trump has been a train wreck when it comes to Epstein. What's the response then? I guess you're saying tune out. But to a lot of people that sounds like giving up. An alternative can't arise, I guess is the point?
Bravo sir.
The Epstein mania is especially saddening because no one is engaging with them holistically: just picking out whatever (in or out of proper context) fits their (and their targetted audience's) bias(es).
If these are legitimate (and accurately traced to sources by the the reader*), these communications between Epstein and whoever else reveal an window into an elite ethnography that has prior been extremely restricted AND a modern investment, networking and intelligence primer by someone who was if nothing else able at executing his intent.
People need to stop reacting and start thinking: even if you take the most maximalist conspiracy view, you now have a map for how they work. Those people should be MORE critically engaged, not less.
I'm sure some are. I'm mostly tracing domestic drama and logistics investment chains: If bro is alive the pandemic got him ten more islands.
*I’ve seen people take routine anonymous tip summaries as hard investigative findings
I look forward to your video criticising Fuentes.
Agree with you on the MAGA right - kudos for taking a principled stance. However, please ditch the ‘Centre-Left’ rebranding. Definitionally and tactically, it just doesn’t make sense unless you’ve changed your views considerably. If you want to distance yourself from the MAGA right, just call them ‘fake Right’ and go back to calling yourself a ‘Sensible Centrist.’ Your other option would be to disown Evola, Carlyle, etc. or make some kind of Scooby-Doo argument that they were aKSuallY leftists all along (!) or if they were alive today they’d be leftists or something.
Watch my discussions with Caleb Maupin next week to see why I find this necessary at this time. I'm still making videos on Evola and Carlyle regularly.
It was high time to demand that people, if they are to be taken seriously, do not equivocate around calling a spade a spade. Looking back, I think that acknowledging that the woke was actually being put away as per the cigar bet and also seeing through the "assassination attempt" (which recognition does not require much effort even with a -5 in the school of schizo) were also appropriate litmus tests. But I suppose better late than never.
Following you for years, on-and-off as I have been variously busy with school and work and such, helped me to understand elite theory, and to feel utterly powerless against it. This drove me to Christ as the only possible solution to our problems.
The slop-MAGA right has been obvious to me since the Q-Anon retardation (probably the most effective campaign of containment, ever).
I do still sympathize with those unwilling to follow your path here. In an endless sea of utter despair, the human heart will crave a W and take whatever it can get, to the point of self delusion. I do not excuse this, but I do understand it. With Maduro in particular I felt this way. The Maduro affair reminded the world that hard power exists, and national borders are entirely fiction. This is not a problem, but an opportunity.
How can you be Centre Left when you made a video called 'Beyond Left and Right: The Political Taxonomy the System Won't Teach You'?
If they can control every node on the political spectrum - even the anti-zionists - controlling the online anti-conspiracy right was easy work.
Right on. I guess we continue to ride the Tiger.
Wow! Hard to believe you come up with all of this on your own. Or do you have help…..maybe outside help?
What sort of comment is this?
The type that gets your response rather than my intelligent screeds of good will and genuine inquiry...
Ikr, he really is in it just for the drama
Twatish sort