I'll give you credit for your intellectual honesty. I wrote you off, like that hackfraud Auron Macintyre and all the other dissident channels and influencers that rush to defend every incompetent flatulence Trump and his troupe of troglodytes emit. If someone is not disgusted by this clown parade and their oligarchic puppeteers, they are not a serious person to me. Maybe I was mistaken. You seem to have integrity and courage to infuriate the majority of your own audience and fellow travellers.
Don't discount how the hysterics of "woke" - which genuinely seemed to be getting completely out of hand for several years - caused many people to support those who appeared to be in opposition to that.
Beyond Right wing circles "woke" did severe damage to what one would have once called the labour movement. Regardless of what online influencers think, at a time of falling living standards, one would have expected huge public support for Labour and the Democrats but no. Both parties seriously tarnished their image by being associated with that madness.
All that's happened on the Right is a similar process of alienating millions of people.
Yes like cowboy. 👍 my name has never been acknowledged in all my years lol. For this alone I will read aurons article with an open mind. I have enjoyed his content in the past especially a few years ago when AA and auron had their bet going. To defend myself though I have to say its completely vibes and gut level feeling but auron reminds me greatly of any nyt reporter. They smell similar.
Your instincts are right about Auron. He works for The Blaze for f sakes. Can’t escape that fact. Furthermore, his cloak of Christianity is quite problematic because of its universalist applications. His religion is a choice. His DNA isn’t. Sadly, he would more than likely reject his DNA (bloodline) before dropping his religious preference, if push came to shove.
Auron was a school teacher, you are straight-jacketed into talking like a liberal when you take that path. Its a scar that he bears. We might have to get used to having people who speak like that on our side. Its not the people and their way of speaking thats necessarily the problem, its their heads full of garbage. But yes, your instincts are bang on. But they are CHUD instincts, as well. Its a give and take situation!
What actually ought to damage the credibility of the author of this article is the number of grammatical mistakes, particularly considering that the same author produced and still sells a course by the name of Foundations of Writing.
Nevertheless, the thoughts outlined therein are sage and salient; expecting the masses to take them onboard, however, is utter folly. It is both tragic and terrifying to notice how debased the mind of the modern mass man has become. At this point, why bother to try to guide these masses towards salvation? Let them all burn in the hell on earth which is now upon us.
I guess I'd need to hear more specifics. Of course Trump has been a train wreck when it comes to Epstein. What's the response then? I guess you're saying tune out. But to a lot of people that sounds like giving up. An alternative can't arise, I guess is the point?
The Epstein mania is especially saddening because no one is engaging with them holistically: just picking out whatever (in or out of proper context) fits their (and their targetted audience's) bias(es).
If these are legitimate (and accurately traced to sources by the the reader*), these communications between Epstein and whoever else reveal an window into an elite ethnography that has prior been extremely restricted AND a modern investment, networking and intelligence primer by someone who was if nothing else able at executing his intent.
People need to stop reacting and start thinking: even if you take the most maximalist conspiracy view, you now have a map for how they work. Those people should be MORE critically engaged, not less.
I'm sure some are. I'm mostly tracing domestic drama and logistics investment chains: If bro is alive the pandemic got him ten more islands.
*I’ve seen people take routine anonymous tip summaries as hard investigative findings
"confirming liberal stereotypes of the right as driven by unthinking hate"
I was involved in (economically) Left wing politics for about ten years until I gave up in despair at the stupidity, hypocrisy, gullibility and uselessness - particularly over immigration. Ten years hanging around Right wing circles confirmed to me that yes a very large proportion of Right wingers, almost always men, are indeed unthinking, hateful and love nothing more than to punch down.
This also includes I'm sorry to say commentators who advance elite theory and then jettison its central tenants in order to blame an entire generation of British people ("boomers") for things they cannot possibly be responsible for. It's especially perverse that they are blamed for mass immigration when the Left hates them for voting for Brexit and ties itself up in knots about whether they want decent pensions or whether they want elderly people to freeze to death in their homes as pay back for them almost totally abandoning Labour. Even more hypocritical is how those who once used to decry the "politics of envy" resent older people for owning homes in a period when bankers and central bankers have deliberately inflated the housing market in order to make higher profits for themselves.
The fact of the matter is most "boomers" spent the majority of their working lives under the neoliberalism older generations voted into office and many of them are still working. They are our parents and grandparents and if you were in the 1% you would love to see so much spite being directed towards them.
Against this backdrop of stupidity and unpleasantness I refuse to identify with simplistic adjectives like "left" and "right"
"continuing down this path risks discrediting rightist ideas for a generation"
Depends which Rightist ideas you mean. But do bear in mind that only 1% of the population have any connection with political Twitter and that the world is non-linear so you've got no idea what's going to happen next week never mind in 15 years' time.
“The Online Right is Almost Entirely Fake"
It's ultimate problem is that it's online. It's an outlet for very frustrated people but pretty much a total waste of energy. Its intellectual silos also cause people to believe fundamentally illogical things in the same way that Leftists ended up supporting castrating boys.
Those who cheer on Trump & his zionist puppet masters are condoning & supporting their war crimes. Goyim celebrating their own slavery . They are mere husks of humanity.
Agree with you on the MAGA right - kudos for taking a principled stance. However, please ditch the ‘Centre-Left’ rebranding. Definitionally and tactically, it just doesn’t make sense unless you’ve changed your views considerably. If you want to distance yourself from the MAGA right, just call them ‘fake Right’ and go back to calling yourself a ‘Sensible Centrist.’ Your other option would be to disown Evola, Carlyle, etc. or make some kind of Scooby-Doo argument that they were aKSuallY leftists all along (!) or if they were alive today they’d be leftists or something.
Watch my discussions with Caleb Maupin next week to see why I find this necessary at this time. I'm still making videos on Evola and Carlyle regularly.
It was high time to demand that people, if they are to be taken seriously, do not equivocate around calling a spade a spade. Looking back, I think that acknowledging that the woke was actually being put away as per the cigar bet and also seeing through the "assassination attempt" (which recognition does not require much effort even with a -5 in the school of schizo) were also appropriate litmus tests. But I suppose better late than never.
Is Bannon fallen, along with MAGA? I got the impression that he was being investigative and canny in his interractions with Epstein. A bit like two fighters circling each other. I think, having heard him speak quite a bit, that his tongue was firmly in cheek when he was telling the Serpent of Brooklyn that his was going become a Zionist or however he phrased it in one of the alarming interractions that the two had.
I'd like to pull this nationalist out of the burning car wreck. I always thought that his efforts were genuine. That his was the orthodox MAGA that was betrayed. "Deconstructing the administrative state." Whereas Trump's MAGA is a cult of personality.
I think Bannon is just as much a part of the swamp as Trump and everyone else. He was apparently in charge of coordinating information from forums like 4chan and using it to craft an electoral strategy. What his motivations are, I don’t know. Maybe he genuinely wanted to improve our country, but he came off really badly to me in the files and seems to be just as corrupt as everyone else.
Plus, he ardently described himself as a Z. As AA has observed, we cannot have these people in charge because they will always abandon what is in our interests for what is in the Z’s interest.
I'm just ignorant of whether or not he considers himself, or claims to be, a Zionist. And I'm burned out on the topic a bit (its gross). I had hoped that he was maybe one of the more impresive people, higher up, that rejected Zionism, or at least its American component.
I feel as though I've heard him speak out against it before, but I can't provide evidence, and he is quite long-winded to have to go through the record. You would think that he would have straightend his head out after Gaza was destroyed, at the very least.
We just can't have any form of Zionism at this point, not even the "safe place for Jewish people" argument bears any weight, anymore. Jews are unsafe because of Zionism. That supremacist ideology decreased their safety in the final analysis. Jews themselves must reject it. A non-Jew promoting Zionism at this point is simply a bad actor, and I include the Evangelicals who hold genuine religious beliefs. A Christian of any type cannot reconcile with the actions of Zionists, at all.
I think they know how unpopular it is, while we are economically struggling ourselves. Bannon was just pivoting like JD Vance. Ultimately, everyone at the top is corrupt. Nothing about the system is redeemable. You are 100% right. That ideology does not benefit anyone, especially them.
So, if third worlders’ just dropped Islam, and if Jews just drop Zionism, everything will be fine then? Yeah, right. A bit suspicious of you already because of the network you’re plugged into. This kind of logic doesn’t do you any favours. Will wait and see, though. Still give you the benefit of the doubt for now.
I'll give you credit for your intellectual honesty. I wrote you off, like that hackfraud Auron Macintyre and all the other dissident channels and influencers that rush to defend every incompetent flatulence Trump and his troupe of troglodytes emit. If someone is not disgusted by this clown parade and their oligarchic puppeteers, they are not a serious person to me. Maybe I was mistaken. You seem to have integrity and courage to infuriate the majority of your own audience and fellow travellers.
Don't discount how the hysterics of "woke" - which genuinely seemed to be getting completely out of hand for several years - caused many people to support those who appeared to be in opposition to that.
Beyond Right wing circles "woke" did severe damage to what one would have once called the labour movement. Regardless of what online influencers think, at a time of falling living standards, one would have expected huge public support for Labour and the Democrats but no. Both parties seriously tarnished their image by being associated with that madness.
All that's happened on the Right is a similar process of alienating millions of people.
Always saw Auron as a grifter. Just the sound of his voice told me off.
Auron is a thoughtfull and important voice and his latest article is great.
And your name is supposed to be Gaucho, isn't it? Like cowboy, not gaunch/ginch as in underwear?
https://auronmacintyre.substack.com/p/the-wests-forbidden-truth-ethnic/comments
Yes like cowboy. 👍 my name has never been acknowledged in all my years lol. For this alone I will read aurons article with an open mind. I have enjoyed his content in the past especially a few years ago when AA and auron had their bet going. To defend myself though I have to say its completely vibes and gut level feeling but auron reminds me greatly of any nyt reporter. They smell similar.
Your instincts are right about Auron. He works for The Blaze for f sakes. Can’t escape that fact. Furthermore, his cloak of Christianity is quite problematic because of its universalist applications. His religion is a choice. His DNA isn’t. Sadly, he would more than likely reject his DNA (bloodline) before dropping his religious preference, if push came to shove.
Auron was a school teacher, you are straight-jacketed into talking like a liberal when you take that path. Its a scar that he bears. We might have to get used to having people who speak like that on our side. Its not the people and their way of speaking thats necessarily the problem, its their heads full of garbage. But yes, your instincts are bang on. But they are CHUD instincts, as well. Its a give and take situation!
MAGA has been like a dud firework that didn't take off but the crowd are still hysterically cheering it on.
Bravo sir.
I look forward to your video criticising Fuentes.
What actually ought to damage the credibility of the author of this article is the number of grammatical mistakes, particularly considering that the same author produced and still sells a course by the name of Foundations of Writing.
Nevertheless, the thoughts outlined therein are sage and salient; expecting the masses to take them onboard, however, is utter folly. It is both tragic and terrifying to notice how debased the mind of the modern mass man has become. At this point, why bother to try to guide these masses towards salvation? Let them all burn in the hell on earth which is now upon us.
Outline the grammatical mistakes.
I guess I'd need to hear more specifics. Of course Trump has been a train wreck when it comes to Epstein. What's the response then? I guess you're saying tune out. But to a lot of people that sounds like giving up. An alternative can't arise, I guess is the point?
The Epstein mania is especially saddening because no one is engaging with them holistically: just picking out whatever (in or out of proper context) fits their (and their targetted audience's) bias(es).
If these are legitimate (and accurately traced to sources by the the reader*), these communications between Epstein and whoever else reveal an window into an elite ethnography that has prior been extremely restricted AND a modern investment, networking and intelligence primer by someone who was if nothing else able at executing his intent.
People need to stop reacting and start thinking: even if you take the most maximalist conspiracy view, you now have a map for how they work. Those people should be MORE critically engaged, not less.
I'm sure some are. I'm mostly tracing domestic drama and logistics investment chains: If bro is alive the pandemic got him ten more islands.
*I’ve seen people take routine anonymous tip summaries as hard investigative findings
"confirming liberal stereotypes of the right as driven by unthinking hate"
I was involved in (economically) Left wing politics for about ten years until I gave up in despair at the stupidity, hypocrisy, gullibility and uselessness - particularly over immigration. Ten years hanging around Right wing circles confirmed to me that yes a very large proportion of Right wingers, almost always men, are indeed unthinking, hateful and love nothing more than to punch down.
This also includes I'm sorry to say commentators who advance elite theory and then jettison its central tenants in order to blame an entire generation of British people ("boomers") for things they cannot possibly be responsible for. It's especially perverse that they are blamed for mass immigration when the Left hates them for voting for Brexit and ties itself up in knots about whether they want decent pensions or whether they want elderly people to freeze to death in their homes as pay back for them almost totally abandoning Labour. Even more hypocritical is how those who once used to decry the "politics of envy" resent older people for owning homes in a period when bankers and central bankers have deliberately inflated the housing market in order to make higher profits for themselves.
The fact of the matter is most "boomers" spent the majority of their working lives under the neoliberalism older generations voted into office and many of them are still working. They are our parents and grandparents and if you were in the 1% you would love to see so much spite being directed towards them.
Against this backdrop of stupidity and unpleasantness I refuse to identify with simplistic adjectives like "left" and "right"
"continuing down this path risks discrediting rightist ideas for a generation"
Depends which Rightist ideas you mean. But do bear in mind that only 1% of the population have any connection with political Twitter and that the world is non-linear so you've got no idea what's going to happen next week never mind in 15 years' time.
“The Online Right is Almost Entirely Fake"
It's ultimate problem is that it's online. It's an outlet for very frustrated people but pretty much a total waste of energy. Its intellectual silos also cause people to believe fundamentally illogical things in the same way that Leftists ended up supporting castrating boys.
Those who cheer on Trump & his zionist puppet masters are condoning & supporting their war crimes. Goyim celebrating their own slavery . They are mere husks of humanity.
Agree with you on the MAGA right - kudos for taking a principled stance. However, please ditch the ‘Centre-Left’ rebranding. Definitionally and tactically, it just doesn’t make sense unless you’ve changed your views considerably. If you want to distance yourself from the MAGA right, just call them ‘fake Right’ and go back to calling yourself a ‘Sensible Centrist.’ Your other option would be to disown Evola, Carlyle, etc. or make some kind of Scooby-Doo argument that they were aKSuallY leftists all along (!) or if they were alive today they’d be leftists or something.
Watch my discussions with Caleb Maupin next week to see why I find this necessary at this time. I'm still making videos on Evola and Carlyle regularly.
Right on. I guess we continue to ride the Tiger.
It was high time to demand that people, if they are to be taken seriously, do not equivocate around calling a spade a spade. Looking back, I think that acknowledging that the woke was actually being put away as per the cigar bet and also seeing through the "assassination attempt" (which recognition does not require much effort even with a -5 in the school of schizo) were also appropriate litmus tests. But I suppose better late than never.
Good job Dr. P.
If they can control every node on the political spectrum - even the anti-zionists - controlling the online anti-conspiracy right was easy work.
Can anyone tell me who his former friends are, please ?
Is Bannon fallen, along with MAGA? I got the impression that he was being investigative and canny in his interractions with Epstein. A bit like two fighters circling each other. I think, having heard him speak quite a bit, that his tongue was firmly in cheek when he was telling the Serpent of Brooklyn that his was going become a Zionist or however he phrased it in one of the alarming interractions that the two had.
I'd like to pull this nationalist out of the burning car wreck. I always thought that his efforts were genuine. That his was the orthodox MAGA that was betrayed. "Deconstructing the administrative state." Whereas Trump's MAGA is a cult of personality.
I think Bannon is just as much a part of the swamp as Trump and everyone else. He was apparently in charge of coordinating information from forums like 4chan and using it to craft an electoral strategy. What his motivations are, I don’t know. Maybe he genuinely wanted to improve our country, but he came off really badly to me in the files and seems to be just as corrupt as everyone else.
Unfortunately he's in the files and seems to have been in regular contact (see the Tommy emails)
Bannon is exactly what he appears to be - a seedy grifter, a flabby older version of Hegseth, riding the zio Trump band wagon.
Plus, he ardently described himself as a Z. As AA has observed, we cannot have these people in charge because they will always abandon what is in our interests for what is in the Z’s interest.
I'm just ignorant of whether or not he considers himself, or claims to be, a Zionist. And I'm burned out on the topic a bit (its gross). I had hoped that he was maybe one of the more impresive people, higher up, that rejected Zionism, or at least its American component.
I feel as though I've heard him speak out against it before, but I can't provide evidence, and he is quite long-winded to have to go through the record. You would think that he would have straightend his head out after Gaza was destroyed, at the very least.
We just can't have any form of Zionism at this point, not even the "safe place for Jewish people" argument bears any weight, anymore. Jews are unsafe because of Zionism. That supremacist ideology decreased their safety in the final analysis. Jews themselves must reject it. A non-Jew promoting Zionism at this point is simply a bad actor, and I include the Evangelicals who hold genuine religious beliefs. A Christian of any type cannot reconcile with the actions of Zionists, at all.
I think they know how unpopular it is, while we are economically struggling ourselves. Bannon was just pivoting like JD Vance. Ultimately, everyone at the top is corrupt. Nothing about the system is redeemable. You are 100% right. That ideology does not benefit anyone, especially them.
So, if third worlders’ just dropped Islam, and if Jews just drop Zionism, everything will be fine then? Yeah, right. A bit suspicious of you already because of the network you’re plugged into. This kind of logic doesn’t do you any favours. Will wait and see, though. Still give you the benefit of the doubt for now.
Are you talking to me? What are you talking about? What network? Am I reading these responses wrong...? Benefit of the...what? Who are you?